SARMS Industry Statistics & Usage Trends 2025

SARMS

SARM Industry Statistics & Usage Trends 2025

From Enhanced Lifters to Curious Beginners — What the Data Really Says

In the last decade, SARMs (Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators) have evolved from obscure research chemicals into one of the most controversial, widely discussed, and aggressively used classes of enhancement compounds in the performance world. By 2025, the SARM market has exploded—not only in underground use but in search traffic, gray-market sales, and even interest from mainstream supplement circles.

This isn’t just a fringe experiment anymore. SARMs are everywhere—from TikTok and Reddit to gyms, MMA camps, and recovery clinics. Let’s dive deep into the numbers, trends, usage patterns, and what you need to know as a lifter navigating this fast-moving space.


🧠 What Are SARMs? (Quick Primer)

SARMs are synthetic compounds designed to selectively bind to androgen receptors in muscle and bone—delivering anabolic benefits without the full-body androgenic impact of traditional steroids. That’s the theory, at least. Compounds like RAD-140, LGD-4033, and MK-677 have become household names among enhanced lifters and even curious gym-goers.


📊 SARM Market Size and Growth (2025 Data)

  • Global SARM market value in 2025: $476 million (estimated)

  • Projected CAGR (2025–2030): 8.1%

  • Online SARM vendor growth: Over 400% increase in new vendor URLs since 2020

  • Top markets: United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada

This rapid growth reflects not only rising demand among bodybuilders but also among biohackers, aging men seeking TRT alternatives, and athletes looking to avoid steroid detection windows.


🌍 Who’s Using SARMs? Demographic Breakdown

Category % of Users (Est.)
Male (18–34) 61%
Male (35–54) 24%
Female (25–44) 9%
Enhanced athletes 53%
Natural lifters/curious 29%
TRT/HRT crossover users 18%

Beginners are entering the SARM world earlier than ever—many as a first step before steroids, often with no medical oversight.


💥 Why People Are Using SARMs

Across surveys, forums, and purchasing data, the top motivators are:

  • Muscle gain without steroids (most cited reason)

  • Fat loss while preserving muscle

  • Shorter detection windows vs AAS

  • Curiosity/testing the waters before real gear

  • Supportive use in PCT or TRT

Some users are blending SARMs into hybrid stacks—combining them with peptides, GH secretagogues, or low-dose test for optimized results.


📈 Most Popular SARMs in 2025 (By User Mentions & Traffic)

Rank Compound Primary Goal Notable Attributes
1 RAD-140 Bulking/Recomp High anabolic ratio, strength gains, suppression risk
2 MK-677 GH/Recovery Boosts appetite, GH/IGF-1 upregulation
3 LGD-4033 Mass building High water retention, fast size gains
4 S23 Cutting/Recomp Very suppressive, lean hardening
5 YK-11 Myostatin Inhibitor Experimental, dry strength focus
6 AC-262 Mild Recomp Lower suppression, emerging as “beginner SARM”
7 SR9009 Fat loss/Endurance Often stacked with fat burners
8 RAD-150 Mass + Recovery Esterified RAD version with longer half-life
9 GW-0742 Endurance/Cutting Less stimulant crash, cardiac focus
10 ACP-105 Lean muscle Rare, mild, no liver toxicity

🧪 Comparison Table: SARMs by Effectiveness, Half-Life, Suppression & Rank

Compound Primary Use Half-Life Strength (1–10) Suppression 2025 Rank
RAD-140 Bulking ~20 hrs 9.5 High 1
MK-677 GH Release ~24 hrs 8 None 2
LGD-4033 Bulking/Recomp ~30 hrs 9 Medium-High 3
S23 Cutting ~12 hrs 8.5 Very High 4
YK-11 Strength/Myostatin ~6–10 hrs 7.5 High 5
AC-262 Recomp/Beginner ~4–6 hrs 6.5 Low 6
SR9009 Fat loss/Endurance <4 hrs 6 None 7
RAD-150 Mass + Retention ~48 hrs 8 High 8
GW-0742 Endurance/Cutting ~6–12 hrs 7 None 9
ACP-105 Lean muscle ~4–6 hrs 6 Low 10

🚨 Side Effects: What Real Users Report Most Often

Side Effect Most Affected Compounds Notes
Testosterone suppression RAD-140, S23, LGD Often requires PCT
Mood swings/anxiety YK-11, S23, SR9009 CNS interference suspected
Acne/oily skin RAD-140, LGD, RAD-150 Due to androgenic activation
Lethargy MK-677 Often from elevated GH levels
Insomnia SR9009, MK-677 Dose timing crucial

📉 Where SARMs Are Sourced (2025)

  • 70%+ from gray market research sites

  • 20% via private Telegram/Discord groups

  • 10% from compound pharmacies or international clinics

Some “SARM” products tested in 2024–2025 were found to contain no active ingredients—or worse, anabolic steroids. Reputable sources are rare.


🚫 Doping & Athletic Suspensions

SARMs continue to show up frequently in WADA-flagged drug tests:

  • RAD-140 remains the most commonly flagged

  • S23 and LGD now showing increased presence in failed Olympic- and NCAA-level tests

  • Many supplement companies fined or delisted due to cross-contamination or undeclared SARM inclusion


📉 SARMs vs Steroids: Shift in Usage

SARMs are increasingly seen as:

  • A “first step” before steroid use (especially among 18–25 year-olds)

  • A bridge compound post-steroid cycle

  • A gateway for body recomp without TRT, appealing to anti-aging clinics and biohackers

31% of surveyed users in 2024 said they “started with SARMs and moved on to testosterone or anabolics within 12 months.”


🔮 2025 Outlook: What’s Next?

  • Emerging compounds like AC-262 and RAD-150 are becoming go-to options for mild or longer-acting cycles

  • Global crackdown efforts by FDA, TGA (Australia), and WADA are increasing

  • Some supplement manufacturers are experimenting with “SARM-like” analogs under different names to bypass regulation


💬 Final Takeaways

The SARM landscape in 2025 is a volatile mix of opportunity, danger, and gray-market science. For advanced lifters, they offer a unique tool in the enhancement toolbox. For beginners, they’re often the first chemical leap into something more serious.

But make no mistake: SARMs aren’t “safe steroids” or shortcut supplements. The market is growing fast, but so are the risks, misinformation, and consequences of uninformed use.

If you’re entering this world—or already deep into it—stay educated, blood-test often, and vet your sources like your results depend on it.

Because they do.


📚 References:

  • NIH: Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) – Overview of Emerging Use

  • WADA Prohibited List 2024–2025

  • PubChem Compound Profiles: RAD-140, LGD-4033, MK-677, S23

  • Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (2023): “SARMs and Hypogonadism in Young Males”

  • Reddit SARMs Community Survey 2024 (Self-reported usage trends)

  • Muscle & Strength Forums User Poll (2024)

  • FDA Warning Letters & Enforcement Reports (2022–2024)

  • Google Trends & SEMrush Organic Keyword Traffic (2023–2025)

  • Biohacker & TRT Clinic Whitepapers (via AgeRX & RegenHealth Global, 2025)